Critical Analysis - Article will be provided Lab Report

Critical Analysis - Article will be provided - research laboratory Report ExampleWhile shoes has been discussed in mainstream media outlets in programs like Star Trek, it empennage most definitely be said that the only real way to understand space in its true form would be to experience it for ones self by experiencing the wonder of locomotion to it. As Dr. Klein writes, In 1998, at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Florida Philosophical Association, Dr. Roy Weatherford gave his Presidential Address, on the honorable imperative of space travel. Weatherford argued that human lives are intrinsically valuable, (Klein p.8).Dr. Weatherford himself goes on to make claims that most would call truly controversial, even for his day. While some have argued for the need of population control through means of parturition control and such, Dr. Weatherford on the other hand made claims to the extent that not only is it wrong in his view to champion birth control, but that the human race should s trive for maximum reproduction. This sort of financial statement resembles the mindset of human dominance even above all else. One could argue that each instal their stance to be valid and held their own individual ideas in high regard. It is very believable that space exploration would be of such great importance as it came to the advancement of the learning of mankind. As for Dr. Weatherfords argument against the use of birth control, while this is something that has been argued before, in the end appears to have more of a religious undertone to it rather than the potential scientific discoveries and benefits of the initial argument made.Further examination of his argument in this case leads to the conclusion that not only is Dr. Weatherford arguing for the mass production of the human race, but that at that place is encouragement on his part for the idea of mass producing the human race not only as much as possible, but in as many places as possible. Dr. Klein would have to of thought this when he reviewed Dr. Weatherfords statements for his own article. Rather than