A Revolutionary Road | Analysis

A ultra Road AnalysisIn a golf club that promotes correctity it is hard enough to come to stimulate oneself as an individual and to find your own identity. In a society that sucks the exceed out of our personality. Maintaining your own identity has little destiny when creation slightly a false image of affluence. This swan is known as the suburbs. The ideas of deception pul guide in a lot of passel that were raised around nice families that only had the Ameri put forward fancy in their mind. In Revolutionary Road, by Richard Yates, hound and April Wheeler are sucked into suburbia with the dream of up deliverance their cardinal kids in a safe and comfortable area. But, as the two quickly find out, suburbia is not each(prenominal) its cracked up to be. Soon, suburbia and the compli custodytary standard gender office poses a enigma for the couple as their relationship begins to deteriorate all over time. But, in express to understand the situation, you must first un derstand the times.The suburbs were created as an escape from the hectic and, sometimes, dangerous flavour in the city. As time went on, the suburbs became known as a middles class paradise with ties to a nearby big city. on with the suburbs came the stereotypical suburban family. The father was the nous of the family while his married woman was wholly under his rule. Her main job was to take care of the kids and cook for the weary domain when he got category. This family was supposititious to endure perpetuallyyaffair together and be the prove perfect example of the contactment of the Ameri mountain intake. This stereotypical chance of the suburbs created a strong misconception that attracted m each families to the area and created a place void of individualism. The romance of the Ameri corporation Dream in the 1950s formed a round-eyed view of suburban life and its equivalent standard gender roles and soaked view of the ideal family structure.The American Dream in the 1950s produced an imposing view of life in the suburbs. In Dwight D. Eisenhowers State of the Union court in 1954, he describes what is the beginning of suburbia when he guesss, The details of a chopine to enlarge and improve the opportunities for our good deal to acquire good foots forget be presented to the Congress by special core on January 25. This program will include Modernization of the topographic point mortgage insurance program of the Federal Government (Eisenhower). This place, as endorsed by one of the near favourite presidents of all time, was sugar-coated from its inception. When Eisenhower spoke, people listened. When he endorses a housing education that will improve the opportunities for anyone living there that can uphold them achieve the American Dream, the public was willing to jump on the bandwagon in a moments notice. So began the false advertisement of the suburbs that ensnared so many families with good intentions of bringing up a beautifu l family in a place that was supposititious to ease them along the behavior. In an article round(predicate) the hi narration of American families, the author describes how people derived their whims on the typical suburban family by saying, The pass It to Beaver ideal of breadwinner father, full-time homemaker mother and dependent blow birdren was a fiction of the 1950s, she shows. Real families of that period were rife with conflict, repression and anxiety, frequently poor and often less idyllic than many assume teen pregnancy pass judgment in the 50s were higher than today (The Way). The false imprint that a public television show had on 1950s society contri thated to the tear down greater fallacy that all suburban families had everything together. The strongity is that the suburbs was a place in love with the kindred basic occupations that everyone else had and maybe even to a greater extent. Many families were under the impression that everything was going fine b eca drill they had all the elements of a traditional suburban family a breadwinning dad, a stay-at-home mom, and servile children. But, simply world able to cite these things does not make a family tantamount to the perfect family that they are perceived to be as evidenced by the conflict, repression, and anxiety. In Richard Portons article on the American Dream and the suburban nightmare, he describes the delusion that many families drowned in when he argues, Lewis Mumford maintained that the suburb served as an asylum for the preservation of illusion. He fumed that suburbia was not merely a child-centered purlieu it was found on a childish view of the world (Porton). Since the suburbs were associated with prosperity and happiness, they likewise became linked to the American Dream. When families entered this suburban paradise they immediately became seduced by the lore and fear of finally achieving that dream. Unfortunately, many neer came out of that dream and continued to be deceived by this fantasy land that was almost juvenile at times. It is easy, now, to be on the outside run acrossing in and wonder how they fail to empathize that things crashing down around them. But since they were so deeply rooted in their dream world, it seemed that everything was going perfectly when, in world, their personal life was a disaster. The American Dream provided the fuel that led to the conflagration that was the impractical view of suburbia.The American Dream in the suburbs formed mistaken family roles that were usually stereotypical. In an article active the role of women in the 1950s, the author explains, Women who spent besides much time outside the home, social commentators were quick to warn, were endangering their families, neglecting their economizes and especially their children. demeanor magazine, in a special termination devoted to the American woman, deplored the changing roles of married couples and placed most of the blame on the increasin gly militant married woman (Womens Roles). The fact that women had to be regulated shows how they were mistreated and forced to fusillade into a role that no one could be completely expert with. A woman who wanted pursue a career was viewed as overaggressive and held responsible for the breakdown of the family. Women were expected to sacrifice themselves for the family and become stay-at-home mothers all because that is what American society says a perfect mother should do. In the kindred article, the author says, The belief in a womans destined social role was reinforced by the popular media of the day The magazines of the time were filled with images of commit housewives whose only pleasures were that their families were satisfied and their chores made easier (Womens Roles). From the start, women neer really had a chance to become what they wanted or pursue a career. From an early age, it was cut into them that they would become a mother and that they would look to their hu sband to bring home the bread and make important decisions. The American Dream stripped women of their readiness to overcome the location quo by sending a relentless message that their purpose in life was to become a housewife and naught more or less. In another article about the subscribe of the 1950s woman, the author says, When women started complaining of boredom, society invented the sowing and quilt making clubs. They would do anything to please their men because their life depended on them so much. To disagree with her husband would gull been the gravest of all errors. The men had almost total control over their wives (A Womans Role). Women who tried to establish themselves as an individual and stand up against societys malformed view of what a suburban family should look like were repeatedly shoved impale into their rightful place. When women started getting out of row, men were quick to invent something to need their time and get their minds back on their tasks. Di sagreeing with the man was an unforgiveable mistake that could begin negative consequences in the future. In spite of their will to change, efforts to change the arrangement were kept at bay by the scheming man who did not want to see his power diminished by a lowly, intractable wife. Overall, the American Dream shaped an unjust role for women in suburban society.In Revolutionary Road, the foolish quest for the American Dream creates an sick family with identity problems and, quite often, complete subjugation. As hotdog finally convinces April that having an spontaneous abortion would be a terrible mistake, she cries in his arms as he proudly echos, And it seemed to him now that no single moment of his life had ever contained a better proof of manhood than that, if any proof were unavoidable holding that tamed, submissive girl and saying, Oh, my lovely oh, my lovely, while she promised she would bear his child (Yates 52). The head of the family in the ideal suburban househo ld was the father. This father was supposed to have everything in complete control and solve every problem that crossed his family. By conquering his wifes emotions and desires, Frank establishes himself as the rightful head of the family because that is what he reckons he is supposed to do. His actions were influenced by the ridiculous idea of that time period and not because he truly conceives that was how he should have handled the situation. When Frank tries to diagnose Aprils problems, he rants on and on about a story of a girl who wished to be a boy and says, I think we can assume, though, he verbalize, just on the basis of common sense, that if the most little girls do have this thing about wanting to be boys, they probably get over it in time by find and admiring and wanting to emulate their mothers- I mean you know, attract a man, establish a home, have children and so on (Yates 245). Franks ignorant comments show the fallacy in the opinion of the 1950s. He says that their goal in life was to attract men and bear their children. Franks comments show the misunderstanding of suburban families because it is hard to believe that souls lifelong goals would be that shallow and without any other ambitions. Women probably wanted more than that but were sucked into believing that that was all they should want which eliminated them as an individual and led them to be controlled by men. After a fight with April, Frank leaves to go do yard work and thinks to himself, Even so, once the first huffing and dizziness was over, he began to like the muscular pull and the sweat of it, and the olfactory property of the earth. At least it was a mans work. At least, squatting to rest on the wooded slope, he could look down and see his house the focus a house ought to look on a fine stick out day, safe on its carpet of green, the frail dust coat sanctuary of a mans love, a mans wife and children (Yates 47). Under the influence of suburban folklore, Frank feels tha t he needs to establish his identity as a man by physically exerting himself and doing something that no woman could do. The sweat on his brow and the percolate of a good days work are what make Frank feel like a man all because someone said that was how a man should act and how a man should feel. The immense work load gives Frank a feeling of masculinity that no woman can give him. Instead of solving his problems with April, he decides to do what a man was supposed to do in that situation instead of the right thinking to do. By and large, the ideal suburban family was so heavily influenced by the American Dream that they failed to find themselves and, instead, fell into a general role that they did not belong nor function well in.In Revolutionary Road, the American Dream has also created a warped and impractical view in the minds of suburban families. When April tries to convince Frank to move to Paris, she tries to pry him from his suburban mood of thinking by arguing,Because y ou see I happen to think this is unrealistic. I think its unrealistic for a man with a fine mind to go on working like a dog twelvemonth afterwardward year at a job he cant stand, culmination home to a house he cant stand in a place he cant stand either, to a wife whos equally unable to stand the same things, living among a crowd of frightened little my God, Frank, I dont have to tell you whats wrong with this environment Im practically quoting you. Just last night when the Campbells were here, remember what you said about the whole idea of suburbia being to nurse reality at bay? You said everybody wanted to bring up their children in a bath of sentimentality. You said - (Yates 115).At this point, April finally sees the lies that they were sucked into when they first bought a home in the suburbs. She is trying to convince Frank who, although he has realized the same lies, is still having trouble letting go of a article of belief that he has held fast to for so long. She real izes that what she and Frank have been experiencing in the past fewer years is not reality and that they need to find a way to break free and Paris would be a great place to do so. In the same instance, April goes further to say, Thats how we both got committed to this fantastic delusion- because thats what it is, an enormous, obscene delusion- this idea that people have to resign from real life and settle down when they have families. Its the great sentimental lie of the suburbs, and Ive been making you subscribe to it all this time (Yates 117). April continues to elaborate on the lies that were told to the couple when they entered the legendary suburbia. When they first got there, they were led to believe that starting a family was the end to real life. The whole time they had been living a lie that neither of them was willing to admit which caused a loss in crucial years of their lives that could have been spent establishing their family as a unique tight-knit group that was n ot influenced by the ignorance of the time period. When Frank and April go on a move with tin can Givings, he fumes on and on about the self-deceit of suburbia and the failures of society by stating, Its as if everybodyd made this tacit proportionateness to live in a state of total self-deception. The hell with reality Lets have a whole bunch of cute little breaking wind roads and cute little houses painted purity and pink and baby blue and if old reality ever does pop out and say Boo well all get busy and pretend it never happened (Yates 68-69). John hits the nail on the head when he describes the fantasy that the people of the 1950s live in. He describes suburbia as a flowery place where everything looks the same and everyone lives far away from reality. When confronted with reality, they act as if it never occurred and go back to the dream that they never want to wake up from never mind the fact that it is destroying them as a person. The American Dream in their lives has d istorted their take on reality and led to them to believe that their way of life is real. By listening to the lies of the American Dream, suburban families were deceived into creating a dream world away from bona fide life that the rest of the world had to human face every day.The desire for the American Dream in the mid-1900s created an immature sentry on suburban life and its corresponding gender roles and unyielding doctrine of the perfect family. Ever since its creation, suburbia has been sugarcoated to please potential home buyers and consequentially ensnared many families during the 1950s through its bold but enticing lies and the reprobate view on what a real American family should look like. It produced absurd roles for a family that made it hard to function properly and took advantage of the wife by forcing her to subject to her husband. Furthermore, the suburbs distracted its residents from real life by fine-looking them a false euphoria that rarely lasted long. Finall y, it made many people give up their dreams and sacrifice their individuality in tack to conform to its views. Its never beneficial to give up your identity which is why so many families have suffered and continue to suffer even today. Rather, it is always best to preserve the individual inside kind of than change your beliefs and morals to snuff it society.Posttramatic seek Disorder Causes and EffectsPosttramatic Stress Disorder Causes and EffectsA War Without EndThe Struggle of Posttramatic Stress DisorderAbstractThis digest is divided into two major parts. The first portion is dedicated to describingposttramatic breed disorder, as well as the stress resolution and its contribution to maturation PTSD.Along with describing PTSD is a reaction to a Frontline Documentary on veterans struggling with thedisorder. The second portion is an analysis of a personal partner that is veritablely undergoing treatmentfor PTSD. Though the information of his treatment is true, information about his identity or personallife will be altered. mapping I.The issue of PTSD has gained a lot of attention with the United States fourteen year endeavor inthe middle east. The number of veterans returning home from Iraq and Afghanistan with PTSD is quitestaggering. To better understand PTSD it is important to look at stress and trauma, and how these twomechanisms manifest. Their manifestation is crucial to our understanding of PTSD.StressStress can best be exemplified as our natural physiologic response to a treat. To say that stressitself is a bad thing would imply that our survival is bad. The stress response is what has allowed ourspecies to adapt and reach our current status. So what is the stress response?It all starts at the hypothalamus which sits dorsal to the limbic system, the system that isresponsible for our stress response. The hypothalamus than triggers our endocrine gland system by relaying galvanising signals to the pituitary gland, also know as the master gland of the endocrine system. Whenthe stimulation of the pituitary is that of a perceived threat, adrenocorticotropic hormone is released touch the adrenal glands (Cohen, 2013). The adrenal cortex responds by releasing cortisol, andthe adrenal myelin releases epinephrine. Cortisol is responsible for raising glucose levels bystimulating the release of stored animal starch in the liver. Epinephrines response is what raises sum rate,dilates blood vessels, and prepares us for the situation that of which caused the sign reaction. All ofwhat falls under this description of stress results from the sympathetic queasy system, and its effect onwhat is known as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axes (Siegel, et al. 2005).TraumaWhen people start out a traumatic event, in more cases than not, they attach an emotionalresponse to said event. Looking at traumas long term effects, we see that these responses can be actedout through unpredictable behavior/emotion, flashbacks, unstable relatio nships, and even physicalpains (APA, 2013). Trauma can affect anyone at any age, and can result from events such as rape,abuse, and as it is most public to this topic, combat. When someone suffers from trauma, a nonthreateningevent can set off a stress response if triggered in some way (Comer, 2014).PTSDIn a simplified explanation of posttraumatic stress disorder, PTSD could be seen as an overactive stress response that follows a traumatic, or serial publication of traumatic events. As is common with thosewho see combat or the inexorable consequences of combat, PTSD has left psychological scars on theveterans who return home after serving.A 2005 Frontline documentary depicted PTSD in a way that was both informative andemotional. One point that stood out about the documentary was the culture of military life, especially inthe army and marines. The culture is essentially this Being violent and reactive is very muchencouraged, showing empathy is weakness, disobeying an order is cowa rdice, and showing signs ofpsychological issues is as cowardice as it is weak. Because of this disturbing belief system it is reallynot a topic to stay politically correct on. Let us start with the fact that violence and responsiveness areconsidered virtues of a soldier. Finding a peaceful resolution has never resulted from fighting fire withfire. Attempts to find peace are crushed by the surge of reaction (Martin Luther King Jr., 1965), and fora very obvious reason. When someone is reactive in a situation that does not readily call for it, moretimes than not mistakes are made. In the case of Rob, this issue came center stage when he opened fireon a civilian women after hearing reports of suicide bombers. She fell with a white flag in her hand(Frontline, 2005). It is not Robs fault that this civilian died, but rather a consequence of war. He feltthat the threat of a suicide bombing was approaching, and instinctively tried to preserve his life, and themen he fought along side. When h e began to struggle with the event, the men around him labeled him acoward.Robs story is not uncommon for those who have fought in this war. Turning to a soldier by thename of Jeff, we see the consequences of not quest help after a traumatic event. According to theFrontline documentary, Jeff told his family of a haunting retrospect which seems to depict theconsequece of blindly following orders. Jeff was commanded to execute two unarmed prisoners ofwar, and his fealty cost him his sanity. Jeffs mental decline was shown through his abuse andexcessive use of alcohol (Frontline, 2005). Jeff committed suicide roughly about a year after serving,which alcohol could be seen as a contributing factor.The experiences of those interviewed in the Frontline Documentary provided great insight interms of PTSD, and with this insight the signs and symptoms can easily be spotted. With thisinformation a brief diagnostic mind will be attempted, and as stated earlier, some of theinformation about th is particular individual has been altered.Part II.BackgroundJohn is a white male in his mid-twenties. He was released from active duty in the phalanx July,2013. John has been receiving psychiatric care for PTSD for a year and a half, and he claims that he hasbeen improving. His psychiatrist has him undergoing drug treatment to help with the symptoms. As iscommon with those suffering from PTSD, John takes Lithium to help with his anxiety and feelings of economic crisis attributed to stress. As an adolescent John was diagnosed with ADHD, and had beenprescribed Adderall up until 10th grade. He has been back on Adderall for the past six month to helpwith concentration, and also for the anti-anxiety benefits of taking a low dose stimulant.BehaviorJohn is rather evasive when talking about his time in Afghanistan. When asked about hisexperience, John seems to steer the conversation towards boot camp, seemingly as an attempt to keephis mind off of his duty served in Afghanistan. The only t hing that could be confirmed is that John hadseen combat on a number of occasions. At times his speech seems disorganized and forced. He loosesattention during conversation quite often, and has trouble holding eye contact. When John initiallyreturned to civilian status he began using methamphetamines for a short duration before seeking help.John has also been trying to limit his consumption of alcohol since being releaved of duty, and thoughhe has stopped drinking every night, his troubles with alcohol have persisted.SummaryJohns behaviors that of which can be observed fall in line with most of the behaviors of thosementioned earlier in the Frontline Documentary. Drug abuse has been the most familiar issue in Johnslife after serving, but he has shown signs of promotion with his current treatment plan.ReferencesComer, R. J. (2014). Fundamentals of Abnormal Psychology. New York Worth Publishers. rewrite July 2014Fulton, Germer, Siegel. (2005). Mindfulness and psychotherapy. New York The Guilford Press.Cohen, B. J. (2013). The human body in health and disease. twelfth Edition. Baltimore, MDLippincott Williams Wilkins.Aronson, Raney (2014) A Soldiers Heart Video. Retrieved February 2015 fromhttp//www/pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/heart/viewKing, M. L. (1965). The three evils of society. (Speech). Retrieved fromhttp//www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8d-IYSM-08